Search for content of interest

  • About
  • ServiceS
    • Branding
    • Innovation
    • Naming
    • Strategy
    • Research
    • Design
  • Work
  • Insights
  • News
  • LOCATIONS
    • Shanghai
    • Paris
    • New York
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia

CN FR
  • About
  • ServiceS
    • Branding
    • Innovation
    • Naming
    • Strategy
    • Research
    • Design
  • Work
  • Insights
  • News
  • LOCATIONS
    • Shanghai
    • Paris
    • New York
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
CONTACT

EN

  • CN
  • FR

Home Insights Our Thinking Detail
Contact Us

Avoiding 50 Shades of Grey and Aiming for the Rainbow: Evolving Segmentation through Digital in China

The Segmentation Landscape in China

Always connected, eyes and fingers on a phone: the complete integration of digital into life in China. But then why do so few segmentations show meaningful, useful differences in digital attitudes and behaviors across segments? Making sense of the Chinese consumer landscape can be daunting. Without incorporating meaningful digital behaviors into a highly prized – and priced – piece of segmentation, questions arise: why was so much spent on a project that is neither strategic nor forward thinking? How can this possibly be used here? And why has it happened? In the increasingly connected world, understanding how to capitalize on differences in digital attitudes and behaviors is a necessity and this should be front-of-mind when designing a segmentation study. In China, segments with no digital differentiation are like shades of grey.

When digital is not well-represented by inputs into the segmentation, differentiation across segments in the outputs is much less likely. Why is this so often the case? What hypotheses exist to explain the status quo?

Hypothesis A: is it because agencies have always used the same approach or even questionnaire, regardless of market, that has not taken into consideration the cultural context and the fact that digital has overtaken life in China?

Hypothesis B: Or perhaps it is because when digital inputs have been used, they have been superficial on a platform/channel level, hence contributing very little to driving people apart into segments?

Why Do We Put Forward these Hypotheses?

Why Hypothesis A: As an industry, we are not great about actually acting upon new learnings and updating our old approaches with new thinking. For example, how many times have you heard ‘big data’ at a conference without hearing specifically what was done? How many times have you heard about falling participation rates with online research, without hearing about a solution? These truths are often pushed to one side to continue on with the status quo.

Why Hypothesis B: Maybe researchers and analysts involved with segmentation builds do not have a sufficiently detailed understanding and appreciation of specific contemporary digital attitudes and behaviors, so fall back on using something more generic. And experts in the digital space are usually not involved in segmentation builds: a typical research agency may not have dedicated digital specialists to deliver input on segmentations. Maybe it is a matter of time, or our old foe questionnaire length; and in the rush to get something programmed it is easier to retain basic inputs like purchase frequency or attitudes towards self. Again, we fall back on what has been done before. 

How Do We Achieve ‘Rainbow’ Separation?

It is a fine balance between higher-level and commonly used attitudinal and behavioral statements and the more granular digital inputs: both are needed in order to form a meaningful segmentation for a highly digitally-involved China market. But then again, with China accounting for 20% of the world’s population, a bespoke approach would seem fitting in order to maximize a brand’s potential. 

What does all this mean? The Research team at Labbrand is partnering with our colleagues at MADJOR, Labbrand’s digital transformation agency, to develop a new approach towards segmentation in China for our clients. The process follows four steps:

  1. Form a hypothetical framework of digital drivers in China. What are the psychological motivators and drivers of digital behaviors and attitudes?
  2. Stress-test that thinking with quantitative research in China. Does it hold true? Is what we thought was important actually important?
  3. Construct category-agnostic ‘digital’ only segments through statistical modeling. Determine: what fundamental types exist? What are the specific and detailed differences driving these segments?
  4. Use these segments, and learnings on which inputs were most effective at discriminating between segments, to check: do we still see higher-level attitudinal and behavioral richness differentiating? Is this an improvement for clients? 

Segmentation – What Are the Possible Barriers?

Without predicting the future, one hurdle that is foreseeable: since segments will be differentiated across multiple indicators (digital, behavior, attitudes, demographics) it will take a lot more time to arrive at a solution that makes sense: a solution where each segment’s essence feels consistently realistic across these multiple dimensions; a solution where we are able to recognize these segments in our daily lives; a solution in which character holds true across all metrics. It is likely this means more iterations of the model will need to be run, with more time invested to see if we have reached an optimal solution (and one with rainbow separation!). 

Segmentation – What’s the Prize?

There could be trade-offs, but the prize is that we optimize an approach that allows rich multidimensional segmentation of consumers which includes meaningful digital indicators. As the team progresses – we are currently on point 3 –we will release updates on our progress. In the meantime, tell us: what are the very best and very worst segmentations you’ve seen in China?

AUTHOR

  • Chris WallbridgeBusiness Director

To download the report

  • SHARE
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 
BACK

Related Article




What Does the Economic Slowdown Mean for Brands in China?

What Does the Economic Slowdown Mean for Brands in China? We are excited to announce the March issue of LABReport, our quarterly publication dedicated to branding in Chin…

Branding Strategies for Chinese Traditional Companies

The resurgence of vintage brands has been a notable trend in the West over the past five years, and it shows no signs of slowing down. Brands that were iconic in the '80s…

Discovering XiaoBing: Microsoft’s Chinese Brand Image

In late June, Microsoft strategically 'revived' its adored chat robot XiaoBing (小冰) in China, making waves on Sina Weibo and the Android app TouchPal. XiaoBing, the charm…

Alphabet or Alpha Bet? How the Transformation of Brand Architecture Impacts Google

In a revolutionary move on August 10th, 2015, Larry Page announced Google's brand architecture transformation, creating the innovative holding company, Alphabet. This res…

Labbrand Expands Global Presence with New York Office Launch

With offices already established in Europe and Asia, Labbrand offers brand creation, brand growth, and brand innovation services by translating insights into effective br…

Sober While Drinking A Glass of Wine? Trend: No or Low Alcohol Wines

In 2024, more than 5 million people participated in the Dry January in France. This month of sobriety, which gains popularity every year, reflects a significant change in…

Brand Performance: Is Your Brand Performing Well in the Social Space?

In the contemporary landscape, leveraging social media is imperative for brand marketers. Beyond the traditional return on investment accountability, understanding and me…

Making Sense of Sound—Sound Naming & Symbolism

Exploring Sound NamingIn 1929, a German psychologist named Wolfgang Köhler conducted a cross-country experiment. The task was simple: when presented with two abstract sha…

Ready to take your brand to new heights?

Let's start a conversation.
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CAREERS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Labbrand Group
  • Labbrand
  • Madjor
  • SpringPillar

* Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

A Labbrand Group Company © 2005-2025 Labbrand All rights reserved

沪ICP备17001253号-3
  • Follow us:
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 

Contact us to get the latest insights, tips, and trends in branding, naming, and innovation.

* Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Cookie Notice

To improve your experience, we use cookies to provide social media features, offer you content that targets your particular interests, and analyse the performance of our advertising campaigns. By clicking on “Accept” you consent to all cookies. You also have the option to click “Reject” to limit the use of certain types of cookies. Please be aware that rejecting cookies may affect your website browsing experience and limit the use of some personalised features.

Accept Reject